Quote Originally Posted by Lonnie View Post
...So what this bill does is simply clarify the scope of the easement identified by the Supreme court. It also puts protections in place for both land owners and recreationists. This is necessary because the easement could be taken away by legislation, it's not defined in the state constitution, it's defined by state statue. ...[/email]
Lonnie -

Subsequent to our exchange of PMs, I did some further research on the issue. At this point, I agree that this is NOT a matter grounded in the State Constitution, as I previously believed, and it IS a matter defined by State Statute.

I was mistaken.

Hopefully the discussion that has taken place here will further your objectives in securing at the Legislative level what the Supreme Court has reasonably interpretted existing statutes to mean, and the support you are seeking.